next up previous contents
Next: Up: Appnotes Index Previous:4 Application Example

RASSP Design For Testability Application Note

5.0 References

RASSP Methodology Document, Version 2.0, Volume 1, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, October 1995. [METHODOLOGY_95]

RASSP Design for Testability (DFT) Methodology document, Version 1.0, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, September 1995. [METHODOLOGY_DFT95]

Evans, J. S., and R. M. Sedmak, " A Hierarchical, DFT Methodology for RASSP ", Journal of VLSI Signal Processing 15, 1997. [EVANS_96]

Evans, J. S., P. McHugh, and R. M. Sedmak, " Integration of DFT into RASSP", Proceedings 2nd Annual RASSP Conference, Arlington, Va. July 1995, pp 217-222. [EVANS_95]

Evans, J. S., S. Sharma, R. J. Tarzaiski, and R. M. Sedmak, "Tutorial on RASSP Design-For-Testability", Beta Site Tutorial Powerpoint presentation, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, Camden, NJ, March 1996.

Tarzaiski, R. J., and S. Sharma, "Design For Test Methodology Applied Across Design and Support Cycles", RASSP Review Powerpoint presentation, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, Camden, NJ, November 1996. [TARZAISKI_R96] - A complete description of the results of the LM DFT methododlogy presented at the Program Review of November, 1996. The presentation was repeatedly given during peration of a display booth where all RASSP achievements were highlighted.

Test Strategy Diagram Example (Subsystem Level), Excel 4.0 workbook, November 1996. [3dm2fe.xls] - An EXCEL implementation of the subsystem level test strategy diagram for the Benchmark 3 Functional Element consisting of one FPCTL board and two FPCAP boards. Requirements, predictions, and differences between these quantities are entered into cells for later distribution to lower level TSDs.

Test Strategy Diagram Example (Board Level), Excel 4.0 workbook, November 1996. [3dm2bds.xls] - An EXCEL implementation of the board level test strategy diagram for the benchmark 3 boards. Requirements, predictions, and differences are described. The TSD automates the interrelationships among the established sequence derived from the singular test philosophy. Test means for the boards and their capabilities of error detection, isolation, and correction are described as cell entries and summaries for higher level application of these resulat is automatically coupled to the next higher level TSD.


next up previous contents
Next: Up: Appnotes Index Previous:4 Application Example

Page Status: in-review, January 1998 Dennis Basara